Links


Town of Gilford Offices


Gilford Main Page
Office of Selectmen
Town Administration - John E. Markland
Town Clerk-Tax Collector - Denise Morrissette
Appraisal Dept. - Marsha McGinley
Finance Dept - Geoff Ruggles
Fire Dept. - Jim Hayes
Gilford Library-Katherine Dormoday
Planning Dept.-John Ayer
Police Dept. - John E. Markland
Public Works - Sheldon Morgan
Parks and Recreation - Herbert Greene

Board and Committees


Selectmen - Connie Grant, Gus Benevides, Kevin Hayes
Budget Committee
Board of Fire Engineers
Library Trustees
Planning Board
Zoning Board of Adjustment

Meeting Calendar

Gilford Schools


SAU #73 Gilford
SAU #73 Mission and Beliefs
Elementary School
Middle School
High School
NHAEP-NH

State of NH


State of NH Official Web Site
State of NH Laws (RSAs)

Executive Counselor


Ray Burton (R)

State Senator


Kathleen Sgambati(D)

State Representatives


Click here for more State Rep info

(R) Allen, Janet F
(R) Boyce, Laurie J
(R) Clark, Charles L
(R) Flanders, Donald H
(R) Heald, Bruce D
(R) Millham, Alida I
(R) Nedeau, Stephen H
(R) Pilliod, James P
(R) Russell, David H
(R) Thomas, John H
(R) Tilton, Franklin T
(R) Tobin, William B
(R) Wendelboe, Fran

(D) Aresenault, Beth
(D) Morrison, Gail C
(D) Reever, Judith
(D) Wood, Jane

Local News


The Citizen (Lakes Region)
The Concord Monitor
The Gilford Steamer
The Laconia Daily Sun
The Union Leader
The Weirs Times

Local Commentary


GraniteGrok
Weekend Pundit
One Voice In Gilford
NH Insider

Main

May 28, 2008

Breaking News: Acting Town Administrator Tenders Resignation

As of this posting, sources reveal that the acting Town Administrator Debra Shackett has given the Selectmen a four week notice that she will be leaving Gilford.

But wait, there's even more breaking news...

She has apparently been offered, and has accepted, the position of Administrator/ Finance Director for Belknap County, replacing the fired Nancy Cook.

Wow!

As a member of the Budget Committee, and a follower of the county's business, it is my opinion that this is good news for Belknap County. Unlike her predecessor, my experience with Shackett when it comes to the budget is all good. Never have I seen her unfamiliar with any aspect of the budget, or unable to quickly get an answer to a question, in the event one is not immediately available.

Congratulations, Deb! In the meantime, the Selectmen have their work cut out for them...

 

April 26, 2008

Much ado about NOTHING?

 

I should think not... LXXXI, LXXXII, LXXXIII.

March 26, 2008

Mr. Campbell weighs in...

When Mr. Campbell speaks, people listen. Here is an excellent letter he has forwarded to share with our readers:
To the Editor:

          The agenda for the Gilford Selectmen’s meeting today (March 26) includes, under “Appointments”, the item “Alice Boucher – Petition”.   I haven’t seen the petition, but I gather that it asks the selectmen to re-instate Town Administrator Juris, to hold a public hearing on the subject, or both.   Perhaps they should hold a public hearing, but it should be solely for the purpose of allowing citizens to speak on the record on the subject.   The selectmen should not reverse their decision and should not make any attempt to explain it.

          The Town Administrator (“Administrative Assistant” would be a better title) is not like a department head, with a well-defined job that lends itself to objective performance evaluation.   Rather, he or she is the alter ego for the Selectmen when they are not in session, which of course is most of the time.   The Selectmen have full authority and responsibility for whatever happens.   It is absolutely essential that a majority of the Selectmen have full and complete confidence in the Administrator and comfort in their relationship with him, both objectively and subjectively.   This is what serving “at the pleasure of the Selectmen” means.   Without it, the person in question must go.   There should be no explanation because the reason may be simply a clash of personalities with no fault involved, no malfeasance or misfeasance.   No shortcoming need be proven, or even suggested.   The Selectmen are our elected representatives, subject to removal by not being re-elected, and they must be free to choose and to un-choose their principal agent.  

Richard H. Campbell
Gilford

[GilfordGrok welcomes all submissions for consideration. Heck-- that means less work for us!] Smile

March 24, 2008

Radio Discussion. Town Administrator Termination, and the Right to Know Law.

On the Saturday radio program, Skip, former Laconia Mayor Tom Tardif, and I discussed the termination of the Gilford Town Administrator and Right to Know law questions. We answer Bill McLean's accusation of us not applying the same level of scrutiny to the BOS as we do to others.

Click here to download the podcast, or use the handy player below. It runs just under 15 minutes long.


powered by ODEO

We will be in attendence at Wednesday's Board Of Selectmen meeting at 3 pm to show our support for them.

March 22, 2008

Lambert & McLean face off...

On Friday, Doug and Bill McLean discussed the recent Town Administrator termination and the Selectmen's next move. As he did in his recent letter, Bill asked why Skip and I are somehow treating allegations of RTK law violations differently than we might in other circumstances. I say we're not-- there's just nothing to any of them.

Click here to download the podcast from WEZS' "Straight Talk with Bill McLean" recorded March 21st-- or use the handy player below to listen:


powered by ODEO

[H/T Steve for audio]

 

March 18, 2008

Time for former Selectman to come clean... Which is it?

Alice Boucher

Former Selectboard Chair Boucher (GG2 file photo)

There can only be one explanation for the recent behavior of former Selectman Boucher. My problem is that there are two apparent choices. Either she is woefully ignorant of the Right-to-Know laws, or is knowingly looking to bait our present selectmen into committing violations of them. If you are like me, the quandary is that when considering who we're talking about here, both ignorance and deceit are equally believable.Surprised 

Let me explain.

The Right-to-Know (RTK) law bars a quorum of Selectmen, in our case, two, from conducting public business outside of the confines of a properly noticed public meeting. Recalling that both her and the former Town Administrator imply without specifics that the other two Selectmen were somehow  violating the RTK, you can watch the video of the March 12 meeting where Selectman Boucher admonishes Selectman Grant for not calling her about this beforehand. HELLO? Attention Ms. Boucher: This would have violated the RTK. Reasonable people might conclude that if the law was in fact violated, perhaps it was Selectman Boucher leading the way. Surprised

Now, according to letters in the papers, we find that former Selectman Boucher, citing her years of "experience" (some might question whether "led down the primrose path" counts as such, but I digress...), is leading a petition drive that asks demands

"the selectmen give answers on why Evans Juris was fired with no explanation."

Silly Ms. Boucher. She knows that first of all, their counsul has advised them NOT to comment. This is normal for these sorts of things. Secondly, much like it is out here in the "real world," employers do NOT blab about the reasons an employee has been dismissed. This isn't legal, as far as I know. Why, businesses know that when it comes to giving information about a former employee to a prospective employer, you NEVER offer negative information, lest you get in trouble. In addition to those constraints, the selectmen face the added conditions of RTK requirements governing their every move. The very act of publicly stating a reason could violate that  law. Again I ask, is former Selectman Boucher hopelessly clueless when it comes to this, or is she simply seeking to lay out a trap for the present board?

Ms. Boucher's letter, in addition to "demands" for "answers" the Selectmen cannot legally give, again follows on a familiar theme as noted above when she writes

"Both Selectman Grant and Selectman Benavides should have spoken to me before hand to get my point of view as to how this could all have been dealt with professionally and not in public like it was done.

Once again, former Selectman Boucher advocates for the violation of the RTK law with this statement. Twice, as a matter of fact. First by looking to communicate outside the confines of a public meeting, and again by suggesting it not be done in public, despite the request of the employee in question, as was his right. Again I ask-- Is this ignorance, or deceit?

Boucher's letter closes by lamenting the "sad situation for our town to be going through." I actually agree with her on this one. Unfortunately, it is the continued actions that SHE has engaged upon that are causing this to drag on. While she might claim to want what's best for the town, her actions are in all actuality what's best for one person and one person only: the terminated Town Administrator. If former Selectman Boucher actually wanted what's best for our town, the she would simply

cork in it

and just go away. Enough, already!

.

March 17, 2008

Breaking News: First Select Board meeting is a wrap.

The Board of Selectmen met Monday afternoon at 4:30pm following the swearing-in of new member Kevin Hayes. The agenda consisted of discussion and prep work for the upcoming March 24 DES public hearing on the Liberty Hill cleanup question. They will be seeking the agenda from DES and will ask about the possibility of moving the event to the school due to expected (encouraged) crowd size.

They also talked about the need for a consultant or environmental lawyer at this point, and whether anybody needs to look over DES' shoulder on the cleanup, or is DES the certifying agent.

Lastly, acting Town Administrator Shackett asked that the Board schedule time to discuss her duties and compenstaion. Gus asked to have the salary ranges of the positions made available to them. They agreed to take up the matter at the next meeting.

With no other business, the meeting adjourned around 40 minutes after it began. The atmosphere was quite orderly, professional, and businesslike. I thought that the chemistry between Selectmen Grant, Benavides, and Hayes along with acting Town Administrator Shackett seemed rather cordial and relaxed. Everybody was very well prepared.

I am upbeat about the prospects for achievement and progress from this point forward. The next regular meeting of the Selectmen is on March 26 at 3:00pm. Between now and then, if you have any thoughts about how to approach the Town Administrator/ Finance Director positions, or something that should be considered in the job description or contract, send it in. The Selectmen need to hear from people with their thoughts and ideas. Who knows-- maybe there's a better way that just hasn't been thought of yet...

Oh, and at that same meeting, the Chair will be elected, along with other positions, and committee assignments. You know-- it almost is starting to feel a little more like spring here in Gilford...Smile

 

 

Ironic, isn't it?

It IS ironic that it seemed that Evans Juris was the person pushing forward the idea of recording the meetings that now take place in the Conference room.  As Doug indicated here, the firing of Evans Juris was discussed on Meet The New Press.  Now, you can see the video of the Selectmen meeting!

I was able to record it from the Public Access cable broadcast.  What I have done for now is to convert (using free software from the 'Net) and clipped out just the part of the Selectmen's meeting pertaining to the firing of Evans Juris - it starts with Doug's remarks to the Board at the end of the meeting.  The only problem is that the Public Access folks did not have the beginning monologue of Alice Boucher stating that nothing was going to be done concerning the matter at that meeting.  

If anyone happens to have that, please let us know and we will post it.  If there is sufficient interest, I can also post up the entire meeting....

 

Former Chairman Alice Boucher's opening remarks (paraphrase: "we'll do nothing")
Note: she is talking about Town Counsel's advice to the Board 

Selectmen meeting - discussing and voting on the termination of Evans Juris.
(Courtesy of GraniteGrok

This is what I'm hearing...

Ronnie Bean forwards the following. I've got to say that this is fairly representative of what I'm hearing from people around town.

I would like to applaud Connie Grant and Gus Benavides for the courage they displayed in the latest Selectmens meeting. At the many meetings I’ve attended, I have never witnessed selectmen Benavides conduct to be anything but professional, never mind "Hostile." I have nothing against Evans Juris personally, but he is known for having an intimidating nature. I think he took that to the next level with his letter that he put out just prior to the town elections. The timing of his letter was clearly an intentional manipulation of the election process.

Juris mentioned that if John Goodhue were a town employee he would have been charged with conduct unbecoming a town employee under "Town Policy." Juris IS a town employee, and manipulating the town elections process is without question "conduct unbecoming a town employee."

Juris also mentioned that Benavides may have wanted to run for town tax collector and wanted to "force an issue with her." Juris actually did run for that position against the previous clerk, and claimed he didn’t even really want the position. This seems a bit hypocritical.

Continue reading "This is what I'm hearing..." »

Discussing the Termination

On the radio program Saturday, Skip, Terry Stewart and I discussed the actions of the Selectmen in terminating the Town Administrator's contract with Evans Juris. We all agreed the Selectmen did the right thing. In talking to folks around town, the feeling is it was none too soon...

Click here to download the podcast, or simply use the handy player below:


powered by ODEO

.

March 14, 2008

"If the Board wishes me to leave, they'll have to fire me..."

Thus spoke Evans Juris appearing on the radio Wednesday morning with Alan Harrison on WEZS 1350.

Click here to download the podcast.

Click here to hear the phrase only "They will have to fire me"

More on the situation.

From the Concord Monitor: 

Gilford's selectmen fired Town Administrator Evans Juris yesterday, in apparent response to a letter Juris wrote to the selectmen last week that was critical of the board.

The vote surprised and upset the outgoing chairwoman, Alice Boucher, who said that the other two selectmen defied the advice of the town's lawyer by their move.

Again, tail wagging dog?  It is the Selectmen that are in charge, not the employees and not the outside consultant (for that is what a lawyer is).  The latter may give advice, but it is expected that the Selectmen will make decisions, even the difficult ones.

To say that Connie or Gus "defied" anyone is laughable.  No one in a position of authority is compelled to do anything with advice. A proper motion was made, seconded, discussed, and voted upon.  Both Connie and Gus are to be commended for having the best interest of the Town in the fore front and doing the right thing by making a decision.    I have a feeling that they just were not going to sit on their hands - it was time to make a decision even over Ms. Boucher's desire to lengthen out the process.

Doug, even though speaking about the office of the Town Administrator, gets it right with the role of the Selectmen:

The Town Administrator does, in fact work FOR the Selectmen, not the other way around.

Now add this:

Boucher said her fellow selectmen have placed the town in jeopardy

For those of us not involved in the "inside baseball" game, may I remind our now-former selectman of this - it seems to have been the kickoff of a political bet that ended up badly for those making that bet.  Placing the blame solely on others seems to be an act of silliness (or working in legacy-saving mode).  Especially when you made the bet.  Stop the spin.
 

On another note: 

"He has done an outstanding job," Boucher said. "This is not going to set over well with the townspeople."

I think that as far as the town folks are concerned, this may be a bit premature to pronounce this as a fact.  I think that the jury on Juris is still out....

 

BTW, I thought that this was REAL rich (and REAL ironic):

"People need to either attend the next selectmen's meeting to voice their concerns or write letters," she said. "I don't know if this can be reversed."

I've made it quite well known that I believe that the Selectmen should be holding their meetings in the evening when most of the taxpayers could attend.  Ms. Boucher adamantly refused to change the meeting time just so that working stiffs like me could not attend. The time that I could attend was the meeting when Ms. Boucher, dare I say, intimidated Connie and Gus to not move the time to evenings, even on a trial basis, until after her "retirement".

Consider the Letter written here for all to see. 

(H/T: PolitickerNH)

March 12, 2008

Breaking News!

Today at their regular meeting, by a vote of 2 to 1, the Board of Selectmen have invoked the termination clause of the employment contract of the Town Administrator. Thirty days' notice has been given, and the Town Administrator will remain on paid administrative leave during that period of time.

 

March 10, 2008

Juris's Missive

You know, this election period at the national level has become rather whiney from the Democratic side at the Presidential level.  With all due respect to those of the Democratic persuasion, it is kind of typified by Michelle Obama's recent outbursts that have seemed to be really "out there" in   complaining about American life in general.  Meanwhile the main candidates, Obama and Hillary,  seem to want us all to believe that everyone in America is a victim of their circumstances, the corporations are all out to get us, nobody can rise to wealth and fame on their own (excepting, the two candidates, I guess - all of whom will out-earn just about 99% of us after starting poor or middle class themselves), yadda, yadda, yadda.  Face it, America seemingly is just is a horrible place to them (and yes, I really disagree with all that, can't you tell).

In my opinion, seems like Mr. Juris wants to join in that whine fest here in Gilford.  Sorry, but "Big Burly Guy claiming victimhood" doesn't cut it.

Especially a few days before an election.  Anyone remember the dirt that came out just before the last election when Debbie Eastman was running for re-election for Town Clerk / Tax Collector?  Anyone remember who her opponent was? 

I certainly was surprised when Doug posted Town Administrator's Evan Juris's memo to the Selectmen and then saw it in the Sun and the Citizen. I've read it, and reread it, and have thoughts on it on several levels.  My thoughts just on the angle of the upcoming election. 

Note:  I'm not a lawyer (so far be it for me to speak to the legal ramifications), not a professional politician (ha!), and I wasn't present at any of these "events" he describes.  But, I certainly have opinions and will exercise my First Amendment rights in commenting on the letter and what was printed in the paper! 

Some quick thoughts:

  1. Going ballastic on the guy that approves YOUR performance review is neither smart or serves to promote longevity in your current position.
  2. The Law of Thermodynamics says that for each action there is a equal and opposite reaction.  Works a lot like that in politics too.  Unlike the real world, however, sometimes, the opposite reaction is multiplied far beyond what is expected.
  3. Mr. Law of Unintended Consequences, meet Mr. Juris.  Shake hands (we all know who will win).
  4. Going back to point #1 - it doesn't help, either, to slag the NEXT guy who may be doing your performance evaluation.  Especially after he already apologized (does that mean ANYONE who opposed you should be apologizing? Heck, I wasn't all that thrilled with the Saltmarch Pond thing either - should I be getting an apology from someone too?)

Note:  You know Mr. Juris...

Continue reading "Juris's Missive" »

March 07, 2008

Breaking News! Town Administrator files formal complaint.

The following letter has been obtained by GilfordGrok. We are printing it in its entirety, saving comments for later...

To:  Alice H. Boucher, Chairman
  Connie Grant, Selectman
  Gus Benavides, Selectman

From:  Evans E. Juris, Town Administrator

Re:  Notification of Hostile Work Environment and Discriminatory  Practices

Dear Board Members:

This letter is to officially notify members of the Board of Selectmen that I am advising you that I am declaring a hostile work environment, along with discriminatory and threatening behavior by Selectman Gus Benavides.

It has now become overwhelmingly apparent that from the time he assumed office that his intentions were to bring personal harm to me through the use of his political office.

As this Board is aware, this matter with Selectman Benavides began within the first weeks of him assuming office.  Mr. Benavides asked questions that had been posed by a former Budget Committee member on how cruiser bids had been awarded in the past.  I had no problem with the questions and explained the process to him and the fact that the Board of Selectmen award bids, not the Chief of Police.  I also did state to him, at that time, that his questions were the same as a former Budget Committee member.

In June of 2007, I filed an official complaint with the Board of Selectmen concerning the Chairman of the Gilford Conservation Commission, John Goodhue, relative to his conduct at the June 19, 2007 conservation commission meeting, clearly stating that if Mr. Goodhue, at the time, were a Town employee, he would have been charged under Town Policy with conduct unbecoming a Town employee.

I outlined the matter to the Board of Selectmen because Selectman Benavides had been present at the time and said nothing in defense of the Administration.  What he did was tell Mr. Goodhue that he would report back to him.

The next day Selectman Benavides interviewed the Assistant Town Administrator and me, without mentioning anything about the public accusation Goodhue had made.  I only later found out after it was brought to my attention by the Planning Director, John Ayer, that I probably wanted to listen to the recording of the June 19, 2007 Conservation Commission meeting.

I brought this forward to the Board, asking them to review the matter. Initially Selectmen Benavides stated that he didn’t recall the accusations until the tape of the meeting was played for the Board. The Board of Selectmen was reluctant to do so because of “political fallout”.  After another two weeks of non-action, it became apparent that the Board would not consider any action I agreed to withdraw it so that the “political fallout” wouldn’t take place.  Selectman Benavides was in the forefront not to take action, but to allow him to speak to Mr. Goodhue privately.

Additionally, as the Board of Selectmen is aware, Mr. Goodhue flatly denied making any statements during the June 19, 2007 meeting, when I brought it to his attention, at a meeting in which you and members of the Land Conservation Task Force were present.  It was not until I stated that it was on tape and that the Board of Selectmen had listened to it that he stated “then I apologize”.

In July, after being in office only three months, Mr. Benavides added items to my evaluation concerning interaction with another department and its employees and then denied that he was responsible for them until Selectmen Grant and Boucher corrected him. 

In a meeting on September 26, 2007, I advised the Board of Selectmen that I felt I needed to seek legal counsel because of actions primarily of Selectman Benavides.  At that time, I informed you of his attitude towards Administrative personnel, and more specifically me.

I also raised concerns over Benavides spending over an hour trying to get me to change the evaluation of a female employee.  During that meeting, he repeatedly told me that I did not do a proper evaluation.  I told him repeatedly that I would not change it, that he has not worked with the employee and that he is unaware of the job that she does.  He, in fact, did speak with other Board of Selectmen members by phone about this and they apparently did not agree with him. He then did not sign the authorization for a pay adjustment.

Also, during the September 26, 2007 meeting, in front of all Board of Selectman members, the Assistant Town Administrator and Administrative Secretary, he stated that when he took office that it was the perception that the “Town Administrator” ran the Town and he was going to make sure now that the Board of Selectmen “runs the Town”, not the Town Administrator.

He went on to say “You know, Evans, when you walk into a room”, he referred to me as having a “big, tough cop image”, because you were Chief of Police, people think you’re running the Town.  He referred to me as intimidating.

It was also apparent during the budget process with the Board that when the Conservation Commission Chairman Mr. Goodhue made his presentation that he could offer no explanation on his budget of less than $5000.00, yet we have a Selectman endorsing him because of his knowledge of how the town operates. This is clearly raises a flag.

Then the situation with the Town Clerk/Tax Collector.  The Administration was instructed to provide options.  We did that.  Selectman Benavides was adamant for a review on how to separate the position and cut the salary and/or eliminate the benefits.  He even mentioned that had he known what this position paid that he would have run for it. His intentions were to force an issue with her and to put her in her place.

 

Continue reading "Breaking News! Town Administrator files formal complaint." »

January 28, 2008

Spreading the news - webwise!

THIS is very good news indeed!

Article Date: Sunday, January 27, 2008

GILFORD — Soon, residents may be able to watch selectmen's meetings from their personal computers.

Town Administrator Evans Juris informed the Board of Selectmen that over the next few weeks the town will be looking into some relatively inexpensive Web hosting services to support streaming digital videos of meetings.

In 2007, the town began recording the selectmen's meetings for broadcast on Lakes Region Public Access. With the recorded meeting already in hand, the town will be exploring the possibility of transferring the video online.

Juris said if this was to happen, residents would be able to access meeting videos through a link on the town website.

I have had a number of chats with Evans in the past and wholeheartedly agree with this decision.  He deserves kudos for getting the recording project in the Conference room up and running and working with the Public Access folks for trial runs (still in process from what I understand).  However, even if recordings are on cable, one still has to know WHEN it will be broadcast.

Putting them out on the 'Net is far better from a time perspective - done properly, anyone with a browser can watch it at any convenient time to them (and not to Public Access).  While having a fast connection will most likely be needed for decent viewing, I think it is worth the effort.

After all, we do it! 

 

September 14, 2006

A real "slap in the face"

So there I was, reading the Citizen, laughing my butt off... No, I wasn't reading the comics (especially "Get Fuzzy", which couldn't make a hyena laugh)- I was reading the article headlined, "Gilford eyes big-ticket budget items". The piece had me nearly crying with laughter right from the first sentence:
Looking at a potential 10.9% budget increase for the town, selectmen are casting a very critical eye on spending for big-ticket items.
"Critical eye" my eye! Excuse me while I catch my breath! Perhaps selectman Grant might have a "critical eye", but the other two? Gimme a break! They have been the stewards that have shepherded increased budgets through the process year after year. Now that the bloated edifice that they helped create is growing on autopilot, they are going to be "critical?"
.
This was not the only laugh I got from the article though- The reall belly rolling guffaws came when reading the reporting on a proposal, as part of the 10.9% increase, to increase the stipend paid the elected selectmen:
Selectmen also looked at a possible $1,500 cut to the executive portion of the Administrative budget. While the $1,500 is not much compared to the overall $447,000 total for the executive expenditure portion, it could be the most important $1,500 of the entire Administrative Budget.
.
The $1,500 represents a proposed increase to the $7,500 already allotted as a collective stipend for the selectmen. Town Administrator Evans Juris recommended the increase. Juris said the selectmen do a lot for the town along the lines of investing time and being on call day or night, even being named in some lawsuits, and in his opinion this was a way to acknowledge the selectmen's efforts and compensate them for their time.
.
When selectmen began discussing the line item, Selectman Connie Grant suggested that the increase be removed from the budget. Grant said with an increase of 10.9 percent to the budget the selectmen should be setting an example to the rest of the town, more can be done with less.
.
Doten and Selectman Alice Boucher did not share Grant's feeling about the increase. Doten said the gesture was a nice way to show their added efforts and to take it away was a real slap in the face.
Selectmen elected to wait on voting on the line item until a public opinion could be gauged by the three on the subject of the increase.
The only "slap in the face" here is that which the two big spending selectmen are giving to the voters and taxpayers. These two actively ran campaigns to get elected to their positions... again and again. They knew how much pay was involved. They both should have known how much work and effort would be required. If they need to get paid for their efforts, perhaps they should step down and take a real job?
.
The town administrator says they should be "acknowledged for their efforts"- Sure, why not? They've been carrying the growing bureaucracy's water in a big way for several years now. It's only fitting, I suppose, that they be thanked for spending more and more of the taxpayers' money with more taxpayers' money... 

September 07, 2006

10.9% ! Yessiree Bob- They're gonna spend that reval windfall!

Today's Daily Sun is reporting a 10.9% increase in the town's budget for the upcoming year! Can't wait to see what the school's is gonna be!
.
It's blamed on the usual causes: salaries, health insurance, and retirement. Please click here to re-read the story about the bankrupt town in NY due to exactly these costs.
.
You didn't think that the big spenders of Gilford were going to just reduce the tax rate to offset the new valuations, did you? No way... why, it's THEIR money! (It just comes from YOUR paycheck)
.
They have no shame.

August 21, 2006

Deflowering Gilford

Kudos to Dr. Ricciardiello in that he has certainly shown that he has a green thumb, at least visually.  It is forcast to bloom tomorrow, which if it does, one might decide by just a sense of smell (its odor of rotting flesh) that he might have a black thumb instead.  His "Tilly", the Corpse Flower is now located at the Laconia Lakeport Fire Station where it can be viewed for $10, with the benefits going to local charities - and kudos again to him for setting this up to help raise money for the worthy causes of the LRGH dental program and the childrens programs of Kiwanis

The "un-kudoes" go to  Laconia's Bob Luther's remark (as reported by the Daily Sun, 8/18) as "Laconia deflowered Gilford".  Innuendo aside, I believe the reason for Laconia being able to showcase this botanical rarity was the administrative decision of Gilford not to allow it to be shown in the good doctor's hometown and not anything special about Laconia.

Therefore, I also give kudos to Evans Juris and the Selectmen for making the right decision in following town procedures.

Even though this is an extremely rare event (and not one that can be scheduled), the rules are there for a purpose.  There was some time ahead of the blooming in which arrangements could have been made (although, they would have to have been expedited).  Having that many potential visitors, along with those here for the Triathalon, would have overwhelmed Gilford.  If it bloomed late, it would have run into the crowds for Old Home Day.

Now, will someone pass me a clothespin for my nose......