Links


Town of Gilford Offices


Gilford Main Page
Office of Selectmen
Town Administration - John E. Markland
Town Clerk-Tax Collector - Denise Morrissette
Appraisal Dept. - Marsha McGinley
Finance Dept - Geoff Ruggles
Fire Dept. - Jim Hayes
Gilford Library-Katherine Dormoday
Planning Dept.-John Ayer
Police Dept. - John E. Markland
Public Works - Sheldon Morgan
Parks and Recreation - Herbert Greene

Board and Committees


Selectmen - Connie Grant, Gus Benevides, Kevin Hayes
Budget Committee
Board of Fire Engineers
Library Trustees
Planning Board
Zoning Board of Adjustment

Meeting Calendar

Gilford Schools


SAU #73 Gilford
SAU #73 Mission and Beliefs
Elementary School
Middle School
High School
NHAEP-NH

State of NH


State of NH Official Web Site
State of NH Laws (RSAs)

Executive Counselor


Ray Burton (R)

State Senator


Kathleen Sgambati(D)

State Representatives


Click here for more State Rep info

(R) Allen, Janet F
(R) Boyce, Laurie J
(R) Clark, Charles L
(R) Flanders, Donald H
(R) Heald, Bruce D
(R) Millham, Alida I
(R) Nedeau, Stephen H
(R) Pilliod, James P
(R) Russell, David H
(R) Thomas, John H
(R) Tilton, Franklin T
(R) Tobin, William B
(R) Wendelboe, Fran

(D) Aresenault, Beth
(D) Morrison, Gail C
(D) Reever, Judith
(D) Wood, Jane

Local News


The Citizen (Lakes Region)
The Concord Monitor
The Gilford Steamer
The Laconia Daily Sun
The Union Leader
The Weirs Times

Local Commentary


GraniteGrok
Weekend Pundit
One Voice In Gilford
NH Insider

Main

July 15, 2008

Breaking News

tax free..tax free

A petition with 65 signatures has been delivered to the Selectmen's office, effectively stopping their plan for a sweetheart deal with the non-profit Village Knolls group-- at least until the voters have their say at a special Town Meeting.

Here is the language of the petition:

As provided in RSA 41:14-a, and pursuant to RSA 39:3, we the undersigned registered voters of the Town of Gilford request the Board of Selectmen call a special Town Meeting to vote on “the proposed sale” of Town-owned land on 43 Potter Hill Road. We believe that the land must be sold as quickly as possible, without any special conditions favoring specific organizations, to a qualified buyer that submits the highest sealed bid offer.

The opposition consists of two camps: Those who don't wish to promote more tax-free or tax exempt subsets of citizens here in Gilford-- folks that won't feel the full impact of spending decisions made on voting day; and those that believe the village is already crowded enough in the area occupied by the parcel in question, and are concerned about the heavy impact of another multi-unit development.

Now we wait for the Selectmen to schedule the meeting. Waiting until the next annual meeting is NOT an option, by the way...

 

March 01, 2008

$136.

That's how much more the county will be snatching from a Gilford family of four this year to fund it's ever-expanding budget.

No matter where one looks, there are events taking place, and choices that need to be made, all of which will have a profound impact on our lives—especially our wallets! Whether it’s budget votes on the ballot, candidates that will either be frugal with our monies or spend it like drunken sailors, and the question of adopting SB2 (surely a no-brainer), this is the time of year when the power is in our hands. In many instances, the choices are pretty clear between business as usual, or adopting a new degree of scrutiny and oversight. The beauty of our system funded through property taxation here in NH is that almost the entire cost and function is controlled right at the local level, and residents, should they choose to avail themselves, have a large amount of say in the final outcome. Except for when it comes to Belknap County, that is. For that, we are at the mercy of 18 people….

By now, most taxpayers in Belknap County should have heard about the looming impact posed by the need for more funds due to reductions in revenues from the state. The county portion of our property tax bills is estimated to rise some 13%. This isn’t chump change. In this prior post, Skip has calculated that this will cost an average Gilford family of four an additional $136 in new taxes, on top of an increase generated no matter what happens at the March 11 budget voting. Laconia, under the constraints of the tax cap, will have to shave some $250,000 from its budget to stay compliant. Proportionally, the story is the same in the rest of the towns in the county.

And here’s the rub—not a single taxpayer from any of the communities has any say in the county budget whatsoever—except for the 3 County Commissioners and the 18 members of the County Convention, comprised of the delegation of NH house representatives. It is their shoulders that we rely upon to keep expenditures under control in order to maintain tax stability. They are the eyes and ears of the taxpayers of the county. Based upon my recent observations, they have failed us miserably.


 

Continue reading "$136. " »

January 16, 2008

A place to live, or Boy Scout camp? The nanny state as nanny town.

I'm sorry, but I have an ingrained problem with government involvment in every facet of our lives. Whether it's learning closet organizational skills and baby yoga at the library or sex education in schools, I just believe it's too much. Why is it that our local property taxes, in addition to what we pay on the state and federal levels, have to be used to further the helplessness of individuals and families in our present day society?
.
Given this latest little tidbit from the Citizen, I have to wonder, did I move into a town to live and work, or did I simply end up where I was as a teenager: Boy Scout camp?
The Gilford Parks and Recreation Department is sponsoring four fun snowshoe hikes geared specifically toward families. These hikes are designed to get families out into the woods and fields for some fun exercise and socialization.
"Fun exercise and SOCIALIZATION?!" I've got to believe our forefathers must be rolling in their graves over this stuff.
.
Oh, and what if you don't have snowshoes? In the olden days, before socialism showed up on the scene, an American would simply participate in the FREE MARKETPLACE and go to the store and BUY THEM. Not any more, reports the Citizen piece:
If you are in need of snowshoes, call ahead and shoes can be provided for the hike.
This is why we pay our local property taxes, taken under the threat of the loss of our homes? Once we are completely helpless and reliant on government for EVERYTHING, then what? Is there no end?

December 07, 2006

Don't forget the county portion of your tax bill...

Gilford taxpayers, along with the other communities that make up Belknap County, fund the county budget through property taxation. The county's budget is now being considered. As information comes along, we will post it and comment. Why would we scrutinize the local town and school budgets and give the county a pass? The County Convention meets this Monday, Dec. 11th at the County Complex at 7:00 PM to review the biggest single chunk of the budget- the nursing home.
.
Another piece of the budget that begs scrutiny is a $5,000.00 line item for the local non-profit public transit authority. As I've lamented in the past, it's bad enough my gas-tax dollars have to fund these wasteful programs, now my PROPERTY TAXES must get flushed down the drain as well?
.
Oh, and if you are interested in the doings of the County Convention, along with the Right-to-Know law, click here to read a posting at our sister site, GraniteGrok.com.

November 07, 2006

Property Taxes

Overall US Rate of Inflation: about 3.7% through September.

My Inflation Rate of My Gilford Property Taxes from July to yesterday:  19.7%

The latter is over 5 times the former.

And yours was? And your feelings about this are (hint: leave a comment!)?

November 02, 2006

Letter-writer finds GilfordGrok a helpful tool.

The following letter has appeared in the local papers. He writes that he found GilfordGrok to be helpful as he tries to understand the town's budget and why his taxes keep going up. This sentiment is certainly nice to hear, as this is why Skip and I created GilfordGrok- to be a place for ordinary citizens to find information on all things Gilford, free from the filter of the local "main stream media".
Addressed to the editor, GilfordGrok,
.
As I was searching for information about the Gilford salary debate, I found a web site that had a lot of helpful information. ( gilfordgrok.com ) This site has figures from credible sites for anyone to confirm. Or if you don’t have the countless hours to compile and compare this enormous amount of information, you could trust that our elected officials on the budget committee have "accurately informed" us! This site also has the letter from the selectmen, also elected officials, questioning the validity of the budget committees report. If , in fact, all of our "elected" selectmen feel the need to chastize the committee taxpayers have elected, and intrusted, to oversee spending, we have more problems than out of control spending. I would think the civil thing to have done would be to have privately compared notes instead of slamming the budget committee in the local newspapers for doing their job. It is quite embarrassing.  One would assume that the people on the budget committee must be, at least, a little offended.  Even IF the figures were a little off, it’s clear to see our town employees are over paid for their responsibilities.
.
 It would appear that when an employee leaves the town that many times the new employee is brought in at the same, or close to the same salary as his predecessor. This may explain why our town administrator with about two years on the job is fourth highest, at $89,542.00, to the 30 or so towns compared. Lets not forget that he also has a fourth ranking assistant at $70,570.00. This may not be the explanation. I don’t believe anyone can even begin to explain the mega salary of our school superintendent! I DO know that my taxes are out of control.
.
 Again the site gilfordgrok.com may help you come to your own conclusion about the generous salaries, don’t forget benefits, of our town employees.
.
Doug Plummer, Gilford
And we appreciate Mr. Plummer's kind words about this site. And his thoughts on the wage issue here in town!

October 25, 2006

2 Forbidden Words: Wages & Benefits

Here is yet another letter from an informed reader. Please feel free to submit letters to us via the contact button to the left, or post a comment on the bottom of any posting. DL
.
Editor, GilfordGrok.com,
.
Recent articles and letters have made me realize where Gilfords taxes are going. In two words, forbidden at town budget meetings, "wages and benefits". Many town and school employees are at the top of the pay scale for over 30 comparable towns. But taxpayers average incomes are down in the middle of that range. Don’t forget that many of these high paid employees are from Gilford therefore increasing the taxpayers average income. By continually funding these huge pay increases we are only making the big gap between taxpayers and town employees incomes even larger. These increases are far more, sometimes double, than the raise people receive in the private sector. We need to eliminate these raises by establishing a "cap" on the positions that are so far above the average. Even better, eliminate some nonessential positions.
.
The last 3 year school contract had an unbelievable 8% increase every year. The latest one is, "only", over 4% but, we pay a higher percentage of their benefits. Meaning that the amount can go up within the contract. The town has requested an increase of 4.1% plus a 1.5%. Do the math, that’s a 5.6% raise while already being higher than most, if not all, of their counterparts in over 30 other towns. They need a big fat dose of "Reality"!
.
I would like to think that some of them are aware that this has to be brought under control. People in the private sector wouldn’t pass up a raise. But, they rarely set or recommend the amount of it such as in the house and senate. Or in this case the Gilford administration and superintendent. Do any of them have a conscience? Or are they so arrogant that they believe they are worth so much more than their peers? It would appear that both the superintendent, with a mega five year contract, and the administrator, who doesn’t want to talk about "wages and salaries", are in this frame of mind. Gilford can’t afford this attitude running our town!
.
Doug Plummer Gilford
The "natives are restless" indeed...

September 14, 2006

A real "slap in the face"

So there I was, reading the Citizen, laughing my butt off... No, I wasn't reading the comics (especially "Get Fuzzy", which couldn't make a hyena laugh)- I was reading the article headlined, "Gilford eyes big-ticket budget items". The piece had me nearly crying with laughter right from the first sentence:
Looking at a potential 10.9% budget increase for the town, selectmen are casting a very critical eye on spending for big-ticket items.
"Critical eye" my eye! Excuse me while I catch my breath! Perhaps selectman Grant might have a "critical eye", but the other two? Gimme a break! They have been the stewards that have shepherded increased budgets through the process year after year. Now that the bloated edifice that they helped create is growing on autopilot, they are going to be "critical?"
.
This was not the only laugh I got from the article though- The reall belly rolling guffaws came when reading the reporting on a proposal, as part of the 10.9% increase, to increase the stipend paid the elected selectmen:
Selectmen also looked at a possible $1,500 cut to the executive portion of the Administrative budget. While the $1,500 is not much compared to the overall $447,000 total for the executive expenditure portion, it could be the most important $1,500 of the entire Administrative Budget.
.
The $1,500 represents a proposed increase to the $7,500 already allotted as a collective stipend for the selectmen. Town Administrator Evans Juris recommended the increase. Juris said the selectmen do a lot for the town along the lines of investing time and being on call day or night, even being named in some lawsuits, and in his opinion this was a way to acknowledge the selectmen's efforts and compensate them for their time.
.
When selectmen began discussing the line item, Selectman Connie Grant suggested that the increase be removed from the budget. Grant said with an increase of 10.9 percent to the budget the selectmen should be setting an example to the rest of the town, more can be done with less.
.
Doten and Selectman Alice Boucher did not share Grant's feeling about the increase. Doten said the gesture was a nice way to show their added efforts and to take it away was a real slap in the face.
Selectmen elected to wait on voting on the line item until a public opinion could be gauged by the three on the subject of the increase.
The only "slap in the face" here is that which the two big spending selectmen are giving to the voters and taxpayers. These two actively ran campaigns to get elected to their positions... again and again. They knew how much pay was involved. They both should have known how much work and effort would be required. If they need to get paid for their efforts, perhaps they should step down and take a real job?
.
The town administrator says they should be "acknowledged for their efforts"- Sure, why not? They've been carrying the growing bureaucracy's water in a big way for several years now. It's only fitting, I suppose, that they be thanked for spending more and more of the taxpayers' money with more taxpayers' money... 

September 07, 2006

10.9% ! Yessiree Bob- They're gonna spend that reval windfall!

Today's Daily Sun is reporting a 10.9% increase in the town's budget for the upcoming year! Can't wait to see what the school's is gonna be!
.
It's blamed on the usual causes: salaries, health insurance, and retirement. Please click here to re-read the story about the bankrupt town in NY due to exactly these costs.
.
You didn't think that the big spenders of Gilford were going to just reduce the tax rate to offset the new valuations, did you? No way... why, it's THEIR money! (It just comes from YOUR paycheck)
.
They have no shame.

August 24, 2006

Gilford K9 serves area communities... free of charge!

Some stories never seem to go away- and never stop causing the fur on my neck to stand-up, so to speak. The Gilford K9 is one such topic. After losing the battle against the town's purchase and deployment of the police dog, my prediction of ongoing and escalating costs has come true. The dog, training, food, veterinary care and the cost of a dedicated cruiser certainly must cost the Gilford taxpayers a pretty penny. My question was, and still is- Does Gilford really need such a law enforcement tool? Do we have enough of a need to justify the program? Can we keep him busy? Well, no, but if we serve an area larger than Gilford, he stays busy enough...
.
Stefanie Phillips reports in this week's Gilford Steamer (online subscription required) that

The loss of the Laconia Police Department's canine, Yogi, in July meant more responsibility was placed on the only canine left in Belknap County. That canine is Agbar, the Gilford Police Department's three-year-old Czech-born German Shepherd.
Gilford's K9 officer

and Agbar are now first on the response list in towns where they used to be back-up and were called out twice in one week recently, one call being in Laconia.

Both the Laconia and Gilford canine units were called in the past to respond to several area towns' calls including Belmont, Alton, Tilton, Northfield, Loudon and Meredith. The first responder called depended upon the distance and location of the call. When asked about the added workload, Parent [K9 officer] said the pair have been managing just fine and are on call all the time. Parent's shifts re scheduled at night when most of the calls are made. "We are designed to be here when stuff happens," Parent said.

 
The Citizen also carried a similar piece about the Gilford police dog. From the August 23rd story, in addition to reporting on the towns which Gilford's K9 will serve, the article tells us this:
While Parent's calls will extend to other departments in Belknap County, particularly Laconia, the Gilford Police Department does not seek compensation for these service calls. Parent did note that the additional calls provide Agbar with valuable on-duty experience. Responding to assist other departments are considered good-faith efforts to help build relations between departments. "It's just law enforcement helping law enforcement," added Parent.
Since when do I, as a Gilford taxpayer, have to provide services in other towns... for free?!!!! I don't care if it "good training." I don't want to pay for it. If there is such a need in the area, then let it be met at the county level. This is a bunch of BS! I really wish I knew someone on the budget committee or somewhere else that could do something about this. While I'm fond of many people in other towns in the area, I don't feel I am obligated to provide them with police dog services.
.
This is just another one of those "little things" that add up to excessive taxation and governmental budgets in this town. If people would focus on the this type of spending and waste as much as they did to their assessments, perhaps those doing the spending would be forced to tighten their belts- thus rendering assessments less important- as taxes might stabilize or even lessen.
.
Oh, and by the way- I don't care about "building relations between departments. Sorry. Go have a beer someplace after you punch off the clock if you want "relations."