« Belknap County GOP-- Endangered Species? | Main | Cost Per Pupil, Elementary School »

AYP Comparison - Gilford vs NH

In my last post, I compared the results of 2006 to that of 2007.  In essence, the results showed a mixed result - not in terms of one year good, another bad but rather that there were ups and downs depending on the school and the subject matter.  The overall summary?  Essentially, depending on the school or the subject matter, between 23% and 30% of Gilford's elementary school students are less than proficient (see after the jump

The part that I did want to review was how Gilford performs with respect to the State as a whole.  After all, one of the purposes of NCLB is to allow comparisons to be made between schools using standardized measurements.

This was good to see:   

Teacher Quality Information School District State

Total Percent Percent Percent
Core Classes Taught by non-HQT 0 0 2.0 1.3
Core Classes Taught by non-HQTin High-Poverty Schools


0.2
Core Classes Taught by non-HQTin Low-Poverty Schools


0.4
Employed Under Emergency orProvisional Credentials N/A N/A N/A 0.2
Bachelor's Degree

50.5 51.2
Master's Degree

35.1 47.3
Degree beyond Master's Degree

14.4 1.2

While having the actual numbers would have been helpful, it shows that while Gilford has less teachers with Masters than the overall State average, more have additional qualifications.  A good thing!

So, how did Gilford stack up academically with respect to the AYP scores?

Elementary School








Student Achievement and Testing Participation Rate Information (Based on October 1 Enrollment)
Achievement Level (%) Reading % Mathematics % Writing %

School District State School District State School District State
Substantially Below Proficient 11 7 9 9 10 16 Null 14 20
Partially Proficient 17 18 20 24 19 19 Null 31 33
Proficient 58 59 56 51 51 47 Null 43 35
Proficient with Distinction 14 16 14 14 19 17 Null 12 10
Testing Participation 99 100 100 99 100 100 Null 99 99

Roughly, the Elementary School is a couple percentage points better than the State overall (proficient or better) in Reading, a percent better in Math.

 

Middle School








Student Achievement and Testing Participation Rate Information (Based on October 1 Enrollment)
Achievement Level (%) Reading % Mathematics % Writing %

School District State School District State School District State
Substantially Below Proficient 4 7 9 11 10 16 14 14 20
Partially Proficient 19 18 20 17 19 19 31 31 33
Proficient 60 59 56 51 47 47 43 43 35
Proficient with Distinction 17 16 14 19 17 17 12 12 10
Testing Participation 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 99

Looks like the Middle School did about 7 percentage points better in Reading (proficient or better), around 6 points overall better in Math and much better in Writing (10 points)!

 

 

 


Number Total Less Total

Of Students Than Proficient Proficient or Better



Percent Percent Percent Percent
Elementary 2006 2007 2006 2007 2006 2007







Reading





Whole School 263 238 29.7% 24.4% 70.3% 75.6%
Ed Disability 35 36 74.3% 80.6% 25.7% 19.4%







Mathematics





Whole School 263 238 29.3% 30.3% 70.7% 69.7%
Ed Disability 36 36 52.8% 69.4% 44.3% 30.6%

 

 


Number Total Less Total

Of Students Than Proficient Proficient or Better



Percent Percent Percent Percent
Middle School 2006 2007 2006 2007 2006 2007







Reading





Whole School 280 269 21.8% 23.4% 78.2% 76.6%
Ed Disability 34 43 64.7% 69.8% 35.3% 30.2%







Mathematics





Whole School 280 269 29.6% 28.3% 70.4% 71.7%
Ed Disability 34 43 79.4% 72.1% 20.6% 27.9%

 

 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/blog-mt2/mt-tb.cgi/394